Biofuel Safety: Is it time for
Bio-PSM?
Biofuel production and manufacturing facilities in
the United States are increasing rapidly. On August
8, 2005, President Bush signed the Energy Policy Act
of 2005 (H.R. 6) into law. The comprehensive energy
legislation includes a nationwide renewable fuels
standard (RFS) that will double the use of ethanol
and biodiesel by 2012.
Biodiesel
Incidents : Biodiesel popularity stems from the
fact that it is simple to manufacture and
essentially free of sulfur and aromatics. Biodiesel
can be easily mixed with regular diesel and used for
running automobiles. Although biodiesel is
non-flammable and non-reactive, manufacturing of
biodiesel poses processing hazards and careful
attention should be paid to manufacture biodiesel
safely as indicated by the following accidents.
-
February 2006
: A fire at American Biofuel’s Biodiesel
plant in Bakersfield, California resulted
destroyed the entire plant. The fire was caused
by a methanol spill possibly ignited by static
electricity.
-
2005 : A
man repairing glycerin storage tank in a
biodiesel facility in Staten Island died due to
an explosion.
-
June 2006
: Fire destroys a biodiesel plant in Canby
Please note the
above list is not comprehensive collection of
biodiesel incidents.
Bioethanol
Incidents : Over 90 percent of U.S. ethanol is
made from corn. Active research is being conducted
to manufacture ethanol from cellulose feedstock –
agricultural waste, plant residue, municipal solid
waste. Below are a few incidents involving
bioethanol:
-
June 15th,
2006, Shively, KY : Two Workers Treated For
Burns After Fire At Shively Ethanol Plant
-
September
22nd, 2005, West Burlington, IA : A grain
dryer was the cause of a fire in an ethanol
plant.
-
September
5th, 2005, Brentwood, CA : Two thousand
gallons of ethanol spilled onto a roadway and
into a storm drain when a tanker truck
overturned.
Please note the
above list is not comprehensive collection of
bio-ethanol incidents.
Safety
Considerations : Both biodiesel and bioethanol
facilities have flammable hydrocarbons especially
highly flammable alcohol.
Methanol, ethanol,
isopropanol are classified as Class IB flammable
liquids according to OSHA 1910.106. Class IB
substances have flash points below 73 F/22.8 C,
boiling point higher than 100 F/37.8 C and can
readily catch fire at room temperature. Therefore,
special care should be taken while handling
flammables in a biofuel production unit. In
addition, methanol also poses toxic hazards.
The prevailing
consensus amongst independent biofuel manufacturers
is that process safety can be achieved by common
sense and enforcement of prescriptive codes and
standards; however, considerable expertise is needed
to comprehensively mitigate biofuel manufacturing
risks.
It is recommended
that the biofuel manufacturers voluntarily adapt PSM
in order to increase the safety of biodiesel
production. Process Safety Management (PSM) has been
successfully adopted by the chemical industries and
refineries in the United States.
Note :
Biofuel production facilities that use over 10,000
pounds (~1500 gallons) of alcohol or flammable
mixtures are covered by the
OSHA PSM rule (29 CFR 1910.119).
PSM can not only
assist biofuel industry in the prevention of
catastrophic events, it can also enhance employee
knowledge of operations, improve technical
procedures, maintain accurate process safety
information, and increase overall facility
productivity. In addition, manufacturing industries
follow Recognized and Generally Accepted Good
Engineering Practices (RAGAGEP) to improve safety
and reduce incidents. Since most of the current
biofuel manufacturers are small operations, set of
guidelines encompassing PSM elements but less
rigorous can be developed for such facilities. At
first glance the documentation requirements of OSHA
PSM seem daunting; however, a guideline document to
ensure compliance with OSHA PSM without consuming
too many resources can be developed.
Final Thought :
To maintain a positive image, biofuels
manufactures should give a serious thought to plant
safety either by implementing “PSM-like” approach or
by developing independent safety evaluation
protocol.